Psypoke :: View topic - Triple Type Pokemon

Myuutsuu wrote:

The only one I think deserves it is:

{gyarados}

Flying/Water/Dragon.

Then again

{azurill}

Normal/Water/Steel

J/K. STEEL! Well flying is a bit strange for Gyarados so why not something weird and wacky for Azurill.

RukarioManiac wrote:

A nut cracker would work against exeggute (dont no spelling). Just imagine, smashing all those eggs one by one. anyway, why hasnt there been a fire/dragon type? Dragons are meant to breathe fire and there hasnt been a fire/dragon? come on....also a steel/dragon type would be a raging death machine, think about it, ice is weak against steel, only dragon could hurt it? perrrrrffffeccccttt............they should have a stronger dragon move, like dragon________ <insert word there

CyberX wrote:

Another pokemon i found should have 3=aerodactyle(rock(or ground ,dragon, flying, although it would be weird to be a ground type while flying ^^)

Author:	bakaneko [ Sun Jul 17, 2005 11:38 pm ]
Post subject:	Triple Type Pokemon
What do you think if a pokemon has triple type or even more? For example: --> Fire/Dragon/Flying --> Psychic/Water/Flying --> Water/Dragon/Flying --> Bug/Water/Rock --> Grass/Water/Rock --> Bug/Poison/Flying --> Ground/Dragon/Bug/Flying

Author:	SwellowLuvr [ Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:24 am ]
Post subject:
I think if some were tripled or more typed, then they'd have way too many weaknesses.

Author:	Sneaky Sneasel [ Tue Jul 19, 2005 11:06 am ]
Post subject:
Yes, it would be WAY too confusing to figure out what attacks would be super effective or not very effective and etc. And what if a Pokemon was Fire/Ground/Rock. It would be 8 times (2 times 2 times 2) weak to Water. Also, if it was a STABed Water attack, then it would be 12 times effective (8 times 1.5)

Author:	Dr.DoubleDuel [ Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:33 pm ]
Post subject:
-> Normal, Fire, Water, Grass, Lightning, Fighting, Dark, Psychic, Bug, Rock, Ground, Flying, Steel, Dragon, Ice, Poison. claps YAY!

Author:	Myuutsuu [ Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:
The only one I think deserves it is: Flying/Water/Dragon. Then again Normal/Water/Steel J/K. STEEL! Well flying is a bit strange for Gyarados so why not something weird and wacky for Azurill.

Psypoke http://iswww.psypokes.com/forums/

Triple Type Pokemon http://iswww.psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=3861	Page 1 of 1

Author:	CyberX [ Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:35 pm ]
Post subject:
missingo-FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE WATER FIRE GRASS THUNDER PSYCHIC PEANUTS hahaha its everythign! And yes..its a bit confusing..although i do agree on the garidos one..

Author:	Dr.DoubleDuel [ Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:18 pm ]
Post subject:
Hahahah! That would be so freakin funny if there was a peanut type .

Author:	RukarioManiac [ Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:32 pm ]
Post subject:
Peanut type what would it be weak against? Peanut type... Anyway, i think the gyrados and lugia thing would be good. Also, grovyle and sceptile should be grass/dragon or grass/flying. :roll: just my opinion.

Author:	Blaze [ Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:41 pm ]
Post subject:
Peanut type would be weak to nutcracker type....

Author:	tessa7338 [ Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:31 pm ]
Post subject:
How abt Fire/ Dragon/ Flying? It would be 4x weak to rock, 2x to Dragon and Electric, but pretty much nothing else.

Author:	Galar [ Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:19 am ]
Post subject:
Myuutsuu wrote: The only one I think deserves it is: Flying/Water/Dragon. Then again Normal/Water/Steel J/K. STEEL! Well flying is a bit strange for Gyarados so why not something weird and wacky for Azurill. I don't think the flying type is strange for Gyarados, because Gyarados is the pok

Author:	AbsolNightmare [ Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:01 pm ]
Post subject:
actually, i think peanut type migh be weak against steel. because with steel, you could make the peanut type into PEANUT BUTTTER!!!hahahaha. and i think the only pokemon who deserves a triple type would be gyrados, but either way itd be really confusing.

Author:	Evil Pikachu [ Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:26 pm ]
Post subject:
Gyarados doesn't need a third type, what it needs is that rubbish Flying type taken off him and put in a decent Dragon instead. I think triple types would be way too confusing.

Author:	Browners [ Mon Aug 01, 2005 5:00 pm ]
Post subject:
like wat Galar said, i think should be water/dragon instead of it being flying type, aswell couldn't the Pokemon Co. programmers give him the choice of intimidate or levitate ability or even its own induvidial ability instead.

Author:	Dr.DoubleDuel [ Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:57 pm ]
Post subject:
Wasn't the reason why Lance from GSC had Charizard and Gyarados is because they can do Dragon Rage? Lol, doesn't that mean that most pokemon are Water/Fire types because they can use Rain Dance and Sunny Day? Lol, just going into relativity here...

Author:	Yumecosmos [ Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:42 pm ]
Post subject:
XD Peanut type! Whoever said that is a genius. I think it should be weak against Jelly type, of course! About the dragon thing, aren't dragons also sometimes associated with water? Like, they live in rivers and stuff? I don't know, but I always thought of dragon types as pokemon like Gyarados. Oh, and a steel dragon would be awesome! Especially if it had levitate!

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	CyberX [ Mon Aug 01, 2005 6:44 pm ]
Post subject:
what abotu scizor? FLYING,BUG,STEEL. and fire can defeat STEAL-TYPED nut crackers. and peanuts can hurt pokemon like bulbasaur if you throw it really hard -.- pokemon abuse. Peanut Beam, Peanut Burst,Peanutbolt,frozenpeanut O_o :roll:

Author:	RukarioManiac [ Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:56 am ]
Post subject:
A nut cracker would work against exeggute (dont no spelling). Just imagine, smashing all those eggs one by one. anyway, why hasnt there been a fire/dragon type? Dragons are meant to breathe fire and there hasnt been a fire/dragon? come on....also a steel/dragon type would be a raging death machine, think about it, ice is weak against steel, only dragon could hurt it? perrrrrffffeccccttt............they should have a stronger dragon move, like dragon________ <insert word there

Author:	CyberX [ Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:35 pm ]
Post subject:
RukarioManiac wrote: A nut cracker would work against exeggute (dont no spelling). Just imagine, smashing all those eggs one by one. anyway, why hasnt there been a fire/dragon type? Dragons are meant to breathe fire and there hasnt been a fire/dragon? come on....also a steel/dragon type would be a raging death machine, think about it, ice is weak against steel, only dragon could hurt it? perrrrrffffeccccttt............they should have a stronger dragon move, like dragon________ <insert word there thats killing the pokemon..very dangerous =P Salamence could be fire/dragon but its also flying cuz it has wigns O_o dragons Do breath fire but they also fly so iono

Author:	CyberX [ Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:59 pm ]
Post subject:
I will Master the Peanut type. Flaming peanut. Fire will burn the jelly aaway and the nutcracker, although thers a side effect, which is the peanut burning too. mm...we should have a peanut tournament hehe 3 judge who makes the best peanut pokemon ^^ Another pokemon i found should have 3=aerodactyle(rock(or ground ,dragon, flying, although it would be weird to be a ground type while flying ^^)

Author:	Aerodactyl727 [ Wed Aug 03, 2005 9:10 am ]
Post subject:
No Aerodactyl is cool as he is 8)

Author:	Evil Pikachu [ Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:29 pm ]
Post subject:
CyberX wrote: Another pokemon i found should have 3=aerodactyle(rock(or ground ,dragon, flying, although it would be weird to be a ground type while flying ^^) Gligar IS Ground/Flying. I think...