Forum Index • FAQ • Login
Psybucks • phpBB FAQ • Psypoke Forums FAQ • Forum Rules • Psypoke Staff
~
|
It is currently Fri Dec 13, 2024 1:41 pm |
|
All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 5 posts ] |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Parasect's Emerald Pokèdex description
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Pokemon Ranger   Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:25 pm Posts: 504 
|
I just happened to notice something with Parasect's Emerald Pokèdex description.
"PARASECT are known to infest the roots of large trees en masse and drain nutrinents." What does that mean? I posted it here because I'm currently unable to obtain Parasect in Emerald to check it. I thought it was an error, please correct me if I'm wrong. |
| Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:16 am |
|
|
|
|
Illiterate  Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:35 am Posts: 72 Location: On Runescape: Varrock sewers. I live in the U.S.A. Hello!!!!
|
en masse.... Im positive that my French skills are telling me that it means in masses = many (English).
_________________ <center>  </center><center><img src="images/trainercards/gaiusmarius.png"></center> <center>  </center> |
| Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:21 am |
|
|
|
|
Pokemon Ranger Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:25 pm Posts: 504
|
Of course, you may be very right. Do you have it on Emerald so you can check it so this thread can be ended?
|
| Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:25 am |
|
|
|
|
Illiterate Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 9:35 am Posts: 72 Location: On Runescape: Varrock sewers. I live in the U.S.A. Hello!!!!
|
Sorry I only have FR & LG
_________________ <center> </center><center><img src="images/trainercards/gaiusmarius.png"></center> <center> </center> |
| Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:26 am |
|
|
|
|
Psypoke Legend   Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:28 am Posts: 646
|
omg.
This forum is for <b>BUG REPORTS</b>. Unfortunately, bug reports are not the same as <b>I THINK THIS IS A BUG BUT I DON'T HAVE THE MEANS TO PROVE IT IS A BUG SO I WILL ANNOY THE ADMINS BY MAKING THEM CHECK UP ON SOMETHING THAT IS PROBABLY ALREADY CORRECT</b>. Seriously, why on earth did you even bother posting this, if you can't even prove if what we have is correct or not? This isn't a thread to blindly pick something on the site and make me check up its validity. _________________   |
| Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:57 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 5 posts ] |
|
All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |